首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between off-site prefabrication and conventional construction methods : two case studies of residential projects
【2h】

Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between off-site prefabrication and conventional construction methods : two case studies of residential projects

机译:异地预制与常规施工方法之间的温室气体排放比较研究:住宅项目的两个案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the construction stage will be more relatively significant over time. Different construction methods influence GHG emissions in the construction phase. This study investigates the differences of GHG emissions between prefabrication and conventional construction methods. This study sets a calculation boundary and five emission sources for the semi-prefabricated construction process: embodied emissions of building materials, transportation of building materials, transportation of construction waste and soil, transportation of prefabricated components, operation of equipment, and construction techniques. A quantitative model is then established using a process-based method. A semi-prefabrication project and a conventional construction project in China are employed for preliminary examination of the differences in GHG emissions. Results show that the semi-prefabrication method produces less GHG emissions per square meter compared with the conventional construction, with the former producing 336 kg/m2 and the latter generating 368 kg/m2. The largest proportion of total GHG emissions comes from the embodied emissions of building materials, accounting for approximately 85%. Four elements that positively contribute to reduced emissions are the embodied GHG emissions of building materials, transportation of building materials, resource consumption of equipment and techniques, and transportation of waste and soil, accounting for 86.5%, 18.3%, 10.3%, and 0.2%, respectively, of reduced emissions; one a negative effect on reduced emissions is the transportation of prefabricated components, which offsets 15.3% of the total emissions reduction. Thus, adopting prefabricated construction methods contribute to significant environmental benefits on GHG emissions in this initial study.
机译:随着时间的推移,施工阶段的温室气体(GHG)排放量将相对更大。在施工阶段,不同的施工方法会影响温室气体排放。这项研究调查了预制和常规施工方法之间的温室气体排放差异。这项研究为半预制建筑过程设定了计算边界和五个排放源:建筑材料的实际排放,建筑材料的运输,建筑垃圾和土壤的运输,预制构件的运输,设备的操作以及建筑技术。然后使用基于过程的方法建立定量模型。中国采用了半预制项目和常规建筑项目来初步检查温室气体排放的差异。结果表明,与常规建筑相比,半预制方法每平方米产生的GHG排放量更少,前者的产量为336 kg / m2,后者为368 kg / m2。在温室气体总排放量中,最大比例来自建筑材料的隐含排放,约占85%。有助于减少排放的四个要素分别是建筑材料的内在温室气体排放,建筑材料的运输,设备和技术的资源消耗以及废物和土壤的运输,分别占86.5%,18.3%,10.3%和0.2%。分别减少排放;预制件的运输对减少排放量有负面影响,抵消了总减排量的15.3%。因此,在此初步研究中,采用预制构造方法可为温室气体排放带来显着的环境效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号